“New Delhi has also embarked on what it ominously calls the ‘final solution’ for the Jammu and Kashmir dispute,” Khan said, rattling off a list of what he termed “gross and systematic violations of human rights” committed by Indian forces. He went through a litany of actions that have “unleashed a reign of fear and violence against India’s 200 million strong Muslim community,” he said, including lynchings, pogroms and discriminatory citizenship laws.Īs in years past, Khan - who favors delivering his speeches in his British-inflected English, in contrast to Modi’s Hindi addresses - devoted substantial time to Kashmir. Geopolitical considerations, or corporate interests, commercial interests often compel major powers to overlook the transgressions of their affiliated countries,” Khan said. “It is unfortunate, very unfortunate, that the world’s approach to violations of human rights lacks even-handedness, and even is selective.
#Imran khan facebook free
Khan also turned his ire on that same community for what he perceives as a free pass given to India. “If the world community incentivizes them, and encourages them to walk this talk, it will be a win-win situation for everyone,” he said.
But messages from the Taliban have been mixed.Ī Taliban founder told the AP earlier this week that the hard-liners would once again carry out executions and amputated hands - though this time after adjudication by judges, including women, and potentially not in public. He struck an optimistic tone about Taliban rule, saying their leaders had committed to human rights, an inclusive government and not allowing terrorists on Afghan soil. In his speech, Khan echoed what his foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, told The Associated Press earlier this week on the sidelines at the U.N.: the international community should not isolate the Taliban, but instead strengthen the current Afghan government for the sake of the people. The United Nations in August also rejected Pakistan’s request to give its side at a special meeting on Afghanistan, indicating the international community’s shared skepticism.
Instead of a mere “word of appreciation,” Pakistan has received blame, Khan said.ĭespite Khan’s rhetoric espousing a desire for peace, many Afghans have blamed Pakistan for the Taliban’s resurgence in Afghanistan because of close links. about taking care of the interpreters and everyone who helped the U.S.,” he said, referring to Afghanistan. cost 80,000 Pakistani lives and caused internal strife and dissent directed at the state, all while the U.S. sanctioned its former partner a year later, but then came calling again after the 9/11 attacks. But Pakistan was left to pick up the pieces - millions of refugees and new sectarian militant groups - when the Soviets and the Americans left in 1989. He launched into a narrative that began with the United States and Pakistan training mujahedeen - regarded as heroes by the likes of then-President Ronald Reagan, he said - during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. “From this platform, I want them all to know, the country that suffered the most, apart from Afghanistan, was Pakistan when we joined the U.S. “For the current situation in Afghanistan, for some reason, Pakistan has been blamed for the turn of events, by politicians in the United States and some politicians in Europe,” Khan said. It was for India’s government that Khan reserved his harshest words, once again labeling Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government “fascist.” But the cricketer turned posh international celebrity turned politician was in turn indignant and plaintive as he painted the United States as an abandoner of both Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan. In a prerecorded speech aired during the evening, the Pakistani prime minister touched on a range of topics that included climate change, global Islamophobia and “the plunder of the developing world by their corrupt elites” - the latter of which he likened to what the East India Company did to India.
NEW YORK (AP) - Prime Minister Imran Khan sought to cast Pakistan as the victim of American ungratefulness and an international double standard in his address to the United Nations General Assembly on Friday.
0 kommentar(er)
